Lenovo’s Smart Clock Essential with Alexa falls to a new low of $45

Lenovo launched a new smart clock at CES earlier this year, and it improved upon its previous models by giving it a pogo docking pin at the bottom and support for Amazon’s Alexa. If you’ve been thinking of picking it up but haven’t gotten the chance to until now, you may want to head over to the device’s listing at Best Buy. Lenovo’s Smart Clock Essential with Alexa is currently on sale for $45 on the retailer’s website only for today — there’s less than 20 hours left for the deal as of this writing. That’s $25 off the smart clock’s $70 retail price and lower than a previous deal at Amazon

Buy Lenovo Smart Clock Essential with Alexa at Best Buy – $45

The Smart Clock Essential with Alexa retains the brand’s Smart Clock 2 cloth design. While its predecessors only supported Google Assistant, though, this model only supports the Alexa voice assistant. It has a 4-inch LED display that shows the time, day and real-time decibel levels in white text on a black background. Lenovo clearly kept things minimal for the model and gave it just a few buttons for the volume, for activating assistant and for setting the alarm.

Lenovo’s compatible docks for the device are optional, but they do improve the experience. The brand has docks that can accommodate the clock along with a wireless charging-capable device like smartphones, for instance. It also sells the Ambient Light Dock in either a sea lion or a squid design that works as a nightlight. You can get the Lenovo Smart Clock Essential from Best Buy at a discount right now in both Misty Blue and Clay Red. 

Follow @EngadgetDeals on Twitter for the latest tech deals and buying advice.

Okta says Lapsus$ breach affected only two customers

Following a breach of its systems in January, Okta has released a forensic report finding that the threat group Lapsus$ accessed just two active customers via a third-party company. Lapsus$ “actively controlled” a workstation belong to an engineer at support firm Sitel for 25 minutes on January 21st, the company said. 

“The threat actor actively controlled a single workstation, used by a Sitel support engineer, with access to Okta resources,” wrote Okta chief security officer David Bradbury. “During that limited window of time, the threat actor accessed two active customer tenants within the SuperUser application and viewed limited additional information in certain other applications like Slack and Jira that cannot be used to perform actions in Okta customer tenants.”

While just two customers were accessed, many more users might have been affected, as Otka has 15,000 customers but over 100 million individual users. Despite the access, though, Lapsus$ was not able to do any MFA or password resets, configuration changes or customer support impersonation, Okta said. “The threat actor was unable to authenticate directly to any Okta accounts.” 

It took Okta two months to notify customers of the Lapsus$ breach, and eventually released a statement saying it “made a mistake” in how it handled things. In a blog post last month, it revealed that 2.5 percent of its customers may have had their data viewed or acted upon during a five day window.

It now looks like the breach was far more limited in scope, but Okta said it took lessons from the situation. It terminated its relationship with the contractor in question and promised to strengthen audit procedures for others. It’s also going to directly manage the devices of third parties with access to customer support tools so it can respond more “effectively” to incidents. Finally, it’s adopting new systems to “help us communicate more rapidly with customers” on security issues. 

Brave’s browser can automatically bypass Google’s AMP pages

Brave is putting Google’s Accelerate Mobile Pages (AMP) on blast with a new feature called De-AMP, The Verge reported. It’s designed to bypass any pages rendered with AMP and take users directly to the original website. “Where possible, De-AMP will rewrite links and URLs to prevent users from visiting AMP pages altogether,” the company wrote in a blog post.

If that’s not possible, then “Brave will watch as pages are being fetched and redirect users away from AMP pages before the page is even rendered, preventing AMP/Google code from being loaded and executed,” it added. 

The new feature was implemented in the name of privacy, security and internet experience, according to Brave. “In practice, AMP is harmful to users and to the Web at large,” the article states. “Just as bad, AMP helps Google further monopolize and control the direction of the web.” It adds that the next iteration of AMP “will be even worse.” 

Google originally promoted AMP as a way to improve the mobile web experience by loading pages faster. However, it has recently been a target of critics who see it as a way for Google to increase its hegemony in the internet ad market by hosting content on its own servers. A group of publishers recently announced it was moving away from AMP, and a lawsuit filed by several US states accuses Google of running a monopoly that harmed ad-industry competitors and publishers.

Brave promises “the best privacy online” with its browser, so of course attacking Google is part of its business strategy. Despite its efforts, though, it lags well behind most other browsers in mobile market share, sitting in the “other” category behind Internet Explorer on Statcounter. De-AMP is now available in beta and “will be enabled by default in the upcoming 1.38 Desktop and Android versions, and will be released on iOS soon after,” Brave said.

Delta confirms it worked with SpaceX to trial Starlink’s satellite internet

Delta Chief Executive Ed Bastian has revealed in an interview that the airline held talks with SpaceX and conducted “exploratory tests” of Starlink’s internet technology for its planes. According to The Wall Street Journal, Bastian declined to divulge specifics about the test, but SpaceX exec Jonathan Hofeller talked about the company’s discussion with several airlines back in mid-2021. Hofeller said back then that the company was developing a product for aviation and that it’s already done some demonstrations for interested parties. 

SpaceX chief Elon Musk tweeted in the same period last year that Starlink antennae for planes would have to be certified for each aircraft type first. He added that the company is focusing on dishes for 737 and A320 planes, because they serve the most number of people.

Hofeller reiterated SpaceX’s quest to put Starlink on planes at the Satellite 2022 conference last month, saying that the company believes “[c]onnectivity on airplanes is something [that’s] ripe for an overhaul.” He said SpaceX is developing a service that would allow every single passenger on a plane to stream content like they’re able to do in their homes.

SpaceX filed an application with the FCC in August last year for a ruggedized type of Starlink antenna that can withstand harsh environments meant for use on planes, ships and other types of moving vehicles. A couple of months later, another FCC filing had revealed that SpaceX was going to test the new “mobile user terminal” on an aircraft for six months. 

Even though Delta had already tested Starlink’s technology, Summit Ridge Group (a consulting firm with expertise in satellite communications) founder J. Armand Musey told The Journal that it could take several years for SpaceX’s satellite broadband to see widespread adoption. It still has to schedule time with airlines to install terminals on their planes, after all, while more established competitors are also taking steps to improve their service.