Amazon re-awarded $10 billion NSA cloud contract after Microsoft dispute

Microsoft failed in its attempt to challenge Amazon’s $10 billion NSA contract. Nextgov has learned the NSA re-awarded the “Wild and Stormy” cloud computing deal to Amazon Web Services after reviewing the decision. While the Government Accountability Office recommended a reevaluation in October following Microsoft’s objections, it’s clear the second look didn’t substantially change the outcome.

Many details of the contract are unsurprisingly murky, but it’s part of a larger Hybrid Compute Initiative that will see the NSA migrate intelligence data from in-house servers to those of a cloud provider like AWS. Wild and Stormy should help the security agency cope with growing datasets without having to manage the storage itself.

This isn’t the first time Amazon and Microsoft have been at odds over a large-scale US government agreement. The two fought bitterly over the military’s $10 billion Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) cloud project, with Microsoft surviving Amazon’s challenge only to watch the Defense Department cancel the contract once requirements changed. Microsoft isn’t down and out when it’s still in the running for the $9 billion Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability deal, but this still represents a significant blow for a company that thrives on government partnerships.

Brave’s browser can automatically bypass Google’s AMP pages

Brave is putting Google’s Accelerate Mobile Pages (AMP) on blast with a new feature called De-AMP, The Verge reported. It’s designed to bypass any pages rendered with AMP and take users directly to the original website. “Where possible, De-AMP will rewrite links and URLs to prevent users from visiting AMP pages altogether,” the company wrote in a blog post.

If that’s not possible, then “Brave will watch as pages are being fetched and redirect users away from AMP pages before the page is even rendered, preventing AMP/Google code from being loaded and executed,” it added. 

The new feature was implemented in the name of privacy, security and internet experience, according to Brave. “In practice, AMP is harmful to users and to the Web at large,” the article states. “Just as bad, AMP helps Google further monopolize and control the direction of the web.” It adds that the next iteration of AMP “will be even worse.” 

Google originally promoted AMP as a way to improve the mobile web experience by loading pages faster. However, it has recently been a target of critics who see it as a way for Google to increase its hegemony in the internet ad market by hosting content on its own servers. A group of publishers recently announced it was moving away from AMP, and a lawsuit filed by several US states accuses Google of running a monopoly that harmed ad-industry competitors and publishers.

Brave promises “the best privacy online” with its browser, so of course attacking Google is part of its business strategy. Despite its efforts, though, it lags well behind most other browsers in mobile market share, sitting in the “other” category behind Internet Explorer on Statcounter. De-AMP is now available in beta and “will be enabled by default in the upcoming 1.38 Desktop and Android versions, and will be released on iOS soon after,” Brave said.