Tesla sued Xiang Ligang, and the latter responded: Actively respond to the lawsuit and safeguard the rights and interests of an industry observer – yqqlm

IT House news on May 11, according to information, a new court announcement was made in the case of Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Xiang Ligang and other online infringement liability disputes. The plaintiff is Tesla Motors (Beijing) Co., Ltd., The case will be heard at the Beijing Internet Court on May 24. According to public information, Xiang Ligang is the founder of Feixiang.com and the founder of Communication World.

Xiang Ligang personally also responded to the case on Weibo, saying that he actively responded to the lawsuit and safeguarded the rights and interests of an industry observer.The response shows that this case originated from the rights protection of Tesla owners at the Shanghai Auto Show on April 19, 2019who, as an industry observer, commented on the rights protection incident, and the comments were analyzed from multiple angles and expressed dissatisfaction and anger against Tesla at the same time.

The following are the main contents of Xiang Ligang’s statement:

1. The reason why Tesla sued me is that on April 19, 2019, there was a car owner’s rights protection at the Shanghai Auto Show. Regarding this matter, Tesla not only did not communicate well with car owners, but also accused consumers of being behind the scenes. In response to widespread anger in the society, as an industry observer, I commented on it. After analyzing the comments from multiple perspectives, I expressed dissatisfaction and anger at Tesla’s arrogance. These contents are all there, and you can find them by searching my Weibo “Tesla”.

‎2. I don’t have a lot of comments on Tesla. I also expressed support for Tesla’s entry into China. A few concentrated comments were Tesla’s arrogant attitude towards Chinese consumers and expressed dissatisfaction. I am not a Tesla black, nor do I stand for any company or power.

‎3. Tesla sued me two years later, using its own economic strength and judicial resources to retaliate against criticism, which once again showed the arrogance of this company.

‎4. As an industry observer,I am only evaluating news events from multiple perspectives, without any fabrication or slander. I will actively respond to the lawsuit and safeguard the rights and interests of an industry observer without affecting my work and mood.

IT House learned that the Shanghai Auto Show rights protection is not the only Tesla incident that has attracted widespread attention from a large number of netizens. The “Wenzhou Tesla brake failure incident” also attracted attention on the Internet, but on May 9, “Wenzhou Tesla lost control. The (rights protection) car owner” issued a public apology through Weibo, admitting that he mistakenly used the accelerator as the brake, and subsequently fabricated false news that slandered and insulted Tesla and Tesla vehicles.