もっと詳しく

Teruji Shimizu, president and CEO of Sony Semiconductor, said he sees 2024, two years later, at the latest.Smartphones outperform DSLRs when taking still photos.

The debate on this topic has never stoppedno matter how the mobile phone progresses, for SLR users, always firmly believe“The bottom level crushes people to death” theory,Think mobile phones can never surpass DSLRs.

But on the other hand, I have to admit that with the improvement of the imaging quality of mobile phones, the card machine market has almost disappeared, and the SLR and micro-single markets are no longer oriented to ordinary consumers, but more sold to professional users. .From this point of view, the mobile phone has surpassed the SLR in terms of taking pictures..

Does the mobile phone surpass the SLR? My personal point of view is that from the perspective of image quality, it is really difficult for mobile phones to surpass SLRs at present. After all, the quality of the lens and the size of CMOS are all flaws that mobile phones cannot solve.

For the vast majority of users, the need for taking pictures is related to recording and sharing, especially viewing on mobile devices. In this case, the portability and ease of use of mobile phones are better than SLRs.

so,Mobile phone photography and SLR photography I think each has its own strengthsHowever, compared with the progress of SLR in the past 10 years, mobile phone photography is rapidly reducing the difference from SLR photography through CMOS, lens components, Ai algorithms, etc. I also found some photo proofs of mobile phone evaluations in recent years, you can feel it.


2012 Sony Xperia S

Why can mobile phones replace SLRs?After reading 10 years of mobile phone photo proofs, I understand
2015 Samsung GALAXY S6 Edge

Why can mobile phones replace SLRs?After reading 10 years of mobile phone photo proofs, I understand
2018 vivo X23

Why can mobile phones replace SLRs?After reading 10 years of mobile phone photo proofs, I understand
2022 Sony Xperia 1 IV

Why can a mobile phone replace a SLR? After reading 10 years of mobile phone photo proofs, I understand
2015 5D Mark III

Since the pictures are all compressed photos, many details can no longer be distinguished, but it is not difficult to see that after entering 2018, the daytime scenery photos taken by mobile phones and viewed on the Internet are not very different from photos taken by SLR cameras. .

Of course, if you like to enjoy the original image alone on the computer and enjoy the joy of 100% magnification, the advantage of the SLR is still greater than that of the mobile phone.

What technologies have mobile phones used to improve the shooting level in recent years? We might as well do a simple inventory to see if these technologies have advantages over SLRs.

Mobile phone from fully automatic camera to adding professional manual mode, and provide RAW format files

First of all, the biggest difference between mobile phones and SLRs is that mobile phones are fully automatic, and SLRs can set shutter, aperture, and sensitivity according to their needs.

Why can mobile phones replace SLRs?After reading 10 years of mobile phone photo proofs, I understand

Because some special photography scenes require the support of the shutter speed, the early mobile phones cannot shoot many scenes because the shutter speed cannot be manually set. Speed, ISO, and aperture can all be adjusted just like a SLR.

And some professional camera phones also provide the same RAW format as the camera, which can keep more details in the photos and facilitate post-adjustment.

The configuration of mobile phone lenses is becoming more and more abundant. There are many standard lenses, telephoto lenses, ultra-wide-angle lenses, and macro lenses.

In the earliest days, mobile phones were designed with a single camera, which obviously could not meet the needs of users for taking pictures. It can be seen from the SLR that different shooting scenes will have lenses for different purposes, and the mobile phone has obviously gotten to this point. Now the design of three-shot and four-shot is basically standard.

The rear camera function of mobile phones is also very powerful, usually including ultra-wide-angle, ultra-telephoto, standard lens, depth-of-field lens, macro lens and other functions. And unlike the SLR, these functions can be achieved through software operation, without you needing to change the lens separately. It is also more convenient to use than a SLR.

Leica and Hasselblad imaging companies cooperate with AI photo optimization algorithm to save post-ps troubles

Anyone who has used a SLR camera knows that although the photos taken by the SLR camera are clear, if you do not use post-processing software to color and retouch, you still cannot achieve good visual effects.

Therefore, using a SLR is basically equivalent to the need for post-production, and post-production is very unfriendly to new photographers, not only impossible to start, but also very time-consuming.

But for today’s mobile phones, users don’t seem to have to worry too much about post-production issues. Many mobile phone brands will use some color-grading algorithms in the post-production stage, as well as cooperate with major image manufacturers to automatically generate a post-production photo after the phone takes a photo. , which greatly reduces the user’s later time and energy, and makes the use more worry-free.

In addition, there are some noise reduction optimizations for night scenes, anti-shake optimizations, etc. In short, the functions that used to be achieved by taking pictures with SLRs can basically be automatically optimized for you.

The quality of the main camera of the mobile phone is improved, and the CMOS size is constantly refreshed

The advantage of mobile phone is software, but for mobile phone camera itself, the upgrade of mobile phone hardware technology is also constantly improving.

It is said that the big one kills people. In fact, although the CMOS of the mobile phone cannot match the CMOS size of the micro-single and SLR, the CMOS size of the camera configured on the flagship mobile phone is already very large.

Therefore, even in terms of image quality itself, regardless of the algorithm, the performance of mobile phones on hardware has been greatly improved in recent years.

Summary: The needs are different, no matter who is good or who is bad, but the progress of mobile phone photography is obvious to all.

I think that although mobile phone shooting cannot really crush SLRs at present, it is infinitely approaching SLRs in terms of updated functions. For example, the improvement of image quality, the improvement of night scene capabilities, and even the effect of bokeh, as well as the ability of long, light, and micro, the mobile phone looks more comprehensive, and the key is more convenient, you can take pictures easily.

For DSLRs, first of all, portability is a complete failure. Any combination of full-frame + professional lens must be at least 1KG, and the weight is 5-10 times that of a mobile phone, so many people do not have the courage to take it out.

However, the resolution, powerful image quality and controllability of the SLR lens are unmatched by mobile phones. For professional photographers, mobile phones cannot fully replace the SLR.

I think you can get what you need. If you use it every day and share it socially, I think a mobile phone is completely sufficient. If you are a professional photographer and pursue image quality, a SLR is naturally a better choice.

Why can a mobile phone replace a SLR? After reading 10 years of mobile phone photo proofs, I understand

Hashtag: apple mobile phone millet

.
[related_posts_by_tax taxonomies=”post_tag”]

The post Why can mobile phones replace SLR? After reading 10 years of mobile phone photo proofs, I understand appeared first on Gamingsym.